Going Off Star Trek

I am, of course, a huge Star Trek fan. I’ve loved Star Trek since my family and I used to watch it every Wednesday evening when I was growing up. I especially liked it’s reassuring, optimistic vision of the future, in which humanity has overcome our petty differences and come together to explore space as one united civilisation. Recently, though – ie in the last few months – something about that vision hasn’t been sitting so well with me: perhaps I’m just getting old and cynical, but what once looked like a united, cooperative humanity, to be honest now just feels like America and American culture writ large. By that I mean, where Star Trek claims to present us with a united Earth culture, if you actually look at it, it’s pretty obvious that the characters and cultural structures we’re presented with are fundamentally American. It is an American film and television franchise after all. The future Star Trek presents us with is one where American culture and the American mindset has somehow risen to dominate the entire globe.

Until now, that has sat comfortably with me, or at least I’ve let it slide. Recently, however, the vision of such an Americanised future has felt more and more insulting. Since their second election of Trump especially, the inherent arrogance of it has become more and more apparent: what gives Americans the right to assume they will dominate humanity’s future? Why will First Contact take place in North America, and why is Starfleet Headquarters in San Francisco? Why are these starships crewed mostly by Americans? Indeed, how conceited do Americans have to be to presume that the supposed warp barrier will be broken by a lone maverick from Montana, particularly given that many Americans currently seem convinced that the world is flat and/or was summoned into existence by an imaginary creator being?

Obviously, Gene Roddenberry intended his future to be global and united, famously putting a Russian at the helm of the first Starship Enterprise at the height of the Cold War. Yet these days such things feel more and more like shallow, hollow gestures, varnishing over an America-centric future where their culture is the only one that matters. And at a time where distain for America is growing and it no longer has any claim to the respect it once had, frankly what once felt so optimistic now feels like gut-wrenching arrogance.

I’m a ‘Cyborg of Necessity’, Apparently

One of the first things I came across when I started browsing Facebook this morning was this very interesting academic paper by my friend Darryl Sellwood, et al. Darryl is fast becoming a great disability studies academic and writer, who I must admit puts me to shame. The paper broadly argues that the choices and decisions surrounding Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) should be primarily made by AAC users; that is, people who actually use communication aids should be the primary voice in the future of the field, the rules, customs and habits surrounding it. I find that perfectly obvious, and it gets no argument from me.

Reading the paper, though, I came across quite an interesting phrase which stuck in my mind. The text seems to switch from area to area quite a bit, presumably as it goes from sections written by one of it’s five authors to another. One of the authors refers to AAC users as ‘cyborgs of necessity not choice’, a phrase which resonated with me quite a bit, and which I think needs exploring. In my 2014 MA thesis, I touch briefly on how the equipment I use to communicate and move around could be said to evoke Borg implants. The Borg are, of course, the cyborgs of Star Trek. When I was writing my thesis, I think I meant this as quite a cute, throwaway remark; yet I am obviously not the only person to pick up upon the correlation. Does the use of specialist equipment by disabled people really render us cyborgs? What could the sociocultural implications of that be? Could we really seem like the hostile, unfeeling drones bent on assimilating every other lifeform which Star Trek depicts? After all, most mainstream science fiction franchises frame cybernetic organisms, from The Borg to Darth Vader, as some form of aggressive, malevolent enemy. To be honest being called a cyborg, albeit one of necessity, throws up a few quite dark implications and connotations which aren’t all that comfortable, yet which I think need looking a bit deeper into.