Last night I saw on the news that the Blue Badge scheme is now going to be expanded to cover so-called ‘hidden disabilities’. They are going to allow people with conditions like autism and mental health problems to park in disabled spaces. This may be a bit controversial, but I’m not sure I approve. Those spaces should be for people whose impairments effect their mobility. They are wider specifically to allow people in wheelchairs access to their cars; I don’t see how a person with a condition which does not effect their mobility would qualify. It would surely mean fewer spaces for wheelchair users. What stops anyone with such a non-physical condition waling as far as anyone else, and why would they physically need wider spaces? Forgive me, but it’s almost as if they want these badges to validate their claims to be just as disabled as those of us with mobility impairments.
As someone with no choice but to speak with an electronic American accent, the regional variations in how people talk has always intrigued me. I just came across this neat little run-down of all the major accents of great Britain. I find it quite call, and was especially amused to see where they took their examples from – for the Liverpudlian accent, they selected Lister from red Dwarf. I’m fairly familiar with British accents, of course, so it would be interesting to now see if I can find a similar video exploring variations in how Americans or Australians talk (mind you, they all sound the same to me…)
I caught the first Bourne film on telly last night. I had seen it before, of course, but not for a long time. Add breaks aside, I was quite taken with it. Bourne is not Bond: he is an agent at odds with the system which created him, unsure of his relationship to it. I was impressed, and decided to do what I did with the Bond series: sit down and watch them in order. Last night I glimpsed a character worth exploring. It has been a while since I diid any proper, decent film analysis so I’m quite looking forward to it.
Acceptance and tolerance are all well and good when it comes to impairments and disabilities, but there comes a point where you just have to worry about some people. At the cafe in the park Lyn and I go to, there are quite a few regulars. One of them is a man who has quite obvious mental health issues. I see him there almost every day, usually around the same time. The thing is, he always wears the same thing: two rather thick jackets and a thick woolen hat,.
It’s boiling out there today – one of the hottest days I can remember. Heading to the park for a coffee earlier, I thought, if I saw the guy in question there, he would have to be wearing less today. I thought it impossible, in this heat, for him to be wearing the same thick stuff he always wears.
But I was wrong. Sure enough he was there in his usual clothes, including the hat. To be honest, I was both alarmed and concerned: it must have been over thirty degrees out there; wearing so many clothes in heat like today’s could do serious damage to a body. I know he has a right to wear what he wants, but surely there comes a point where we have to intervene.
I spoke to Mike, who owns the cafe, about it. He went over and spoke briefly to the guy. I heard a nonsensical response indicative of someone with severe mental issues, and Mike left him alone. What else could he do? Should we have intervened? In today’s heat, wearing what he was wearing, there was a real chance he could lose consciousness. If someone saw me about to hurt myself due to my CP – if I was about to fall over, say – I would hope they would step in. Doesn’t the same principal apply here?
There are now several things I’m looking forward to. This morning I got wind that the twenty-fifth Bond film will be released in December next year. I think I have mentioned on here before how excited I was at the news that Danny Boyle is directing it. The gossip is that he now plans something completely new and original in this film – something which would make it stand out from the rest of the Bond canon. I’m something of a Boyle fan, and know what he is capable of, so I think we’re in for a real treat next year. The guy who gave us Happy and Glorious will surely bring us something new to the franchise.
Before that I have other things I’m looking forward to though. In a couple of weeks Lyn and I set off for Poland to go to the same festival we went to last year. Immediately after that we’re going up to Chester for Charlie’s wedding. That will certainly be an interesting, adventure-filled few days.
After that, I’m quite looking forward to the opening of Crossrail this December, believe it or not. The metropolis still fascinates me, and I feel this new rail network will add a new dimension to it. We’ll be able to go all over the city so much easier. It will add something new to this fascinating place, and my explorations will probably increase tenfold.
There are other things, but you get the idea. I mentioned the biggie – the return of Captain Picard – the other day. When I think about it, I have a load of cool stuff to look forward to. My weblog archive should be restored soon too (hint to the Lukester there!). I lead an awesome life full of great memories, both already existing and yet to be created Thus, as worked up as I get about politics, I can never get too down.
Today I tried to do more of the exploring I noted here, getting the tube up to stratford and then trying to find the Lea. It really is lovely up there, and very picturesque. I am certainly going to have to take Lyn up there soon. Oddly, though, I found it much harder going this time. A lot of the pathways were blocked off for work. I managed to make it back to the north shore of the Thames though, before getting the cablecar over the wide, majestic river and rolling home.
I put this together a day or two ago in an attempt at visual satire. I know it’s very rough, but I think it sums up the current brexit situation quite nicely.